The Jews Missed The Meaning of Holiness Luke 3

THE JEWS MISSED THE MEANING OF HOLINESS

SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 08 2013

Charles e Whisnant, Pastor/Teacher, Preacher

Please open your bible today to Luke 3:21-22. What does God want us to learn today?

bible eyeglasses good

ROMANS 10: 3 ‘THEY” Being the Jewish people “BEING IGNORANT OF GOD’S RIGHTEOUSNES>” Which seems impossible doesn’t it? How could they not have seen just how righteous God was and is. THE DOCTRINE OF GOD’S RIGHTEOUSNESS.

Now remember what we’ve been learning. In the book of Romans Paul is endeavoring to present the gospel of justification by grace through faith. In other words, he’s presenting how to be right with God, how to have a relationship with God, And he’s presented that…a man becomes right with God through faith, God’s grace reaches out and the man responds by faith.

The Jews, however, have rejected this.

They have rejected Christ. They have rejected the gospel. They have, for the most part, rejected the preaching of the Apostles. And Paul knows that if he is to make any points with his teaching, he’s going to have to deal with this unbelief of Israel.

He’s got to explain it somehow because unknowing and unwitting people are going to say, “Well how can we believe this is true if the Jews who are God’s people don’t believe it’s true?” So he must discuss the unbelief of Israel as a defense of the validity of the doctrine of justification by grace through faith. He’s got to explain the unbelief of Israel.

And so this is not some incidental text, this is the heart of his argument, this is the apologetic.

If the gospel is really true then you better tell us why the people of God have rejected it…the ones who have always received God’s law, the ones who have written down God’s law, who have preserved God’s law, who are the people of the covenant and the people of promise…if they reject it then you better tell us how that can happen if it’s really God’s message. And that’s exactly what he does. But that’s only the first half.

The first reason to explain Israel’s unbelief is God’s sovereignty.

The second one is Israel’s willful ignorance. And the two always go together…they always go together, they’re always in perfect harmony, concurrence and balance that where you have God rejecting a person, being it an Esau or a Pharaoh or whoever else they might represent you will also have in that person willful ignorance and unbelief.

One does not exist without the other. God doesn’t just damn people apart from their own choices, they act in concurrence.

And remember last time I told you five things that we need to note.

They were ignorant of the person of God, They were ignorant of the provision of Christ, They were ignorant of the place of faith, They were ignorant of the perimeters of salvation and They were ignorant of the predictions of Scripture.

Romans 10:3 For not knowing (50) about God’s righteousness(1343) and seeking to establish their own, they did not subject themselves to the righteousness of God. (NASB:

They did not know the way that God makes people right with him. And they tried to make themselves right in their own way. So they did not accept God’s way of making people right. (ICB: Nelson) For they, being, ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God..” kjv

The Jews failed to see the Holiness of God.…… They either refused to believe, or they were ignorant of the importance of knowing who God was.

If a person doesn’t understand God’s rightness, that is the supreme ignorance. If we imagine that God is less than He is, we have made a fatal mistake because we find God less than perfect, therefore He tolerates sin and imperfection, therefore we’re going to be okay if we just improve a few things…fatal mistake…fatal mistake.

Some verses in the O.T. About this matter of the holiness of God

Romans 10 Lev Holiness

Leviticus 18 and 19 Called the law of holiness where God lays down the principles for society and for morality within society. Would we heed those in our current society today. And all these are His perfect expressions of His absolute purity. And He always sets Himself as the standard and this is what is so great about Leviticus that Dorothy and most of you find so hard to get into. Either did the Jews it seems. I am going to look in Leviticus 19 “Laws of Holiness and Justice.

How to Spell ‘Holy’ (Leviticus 19:1-37)

  1. Leviticus chapter 19 provides us with an exposition on the practice of holiness. The holiness of God is thus revealed in relationship to the redemption of Israel out of Egypt. Consequently, it is not until after the exodus that God calls upon His people to live holy lives. The Mosaic Covenant is established so that Israel would be a holy nation (Exod. 19:6). While there are hints at how holiness is to be practiced by the people of God earlier in the Pentateuch, it is in the 19th chapter of the Book of Leviticus that holiness is defined in great detail.

    1. First, it is important because of the distorted perceptions of holiness.

    2. Second, Leviticus 19 is vitally important because of the desperate need for the practice of holiness.

    3. Third, many sincere Christians have gone astray seeking an unholy holiness.

    4. Fourth, Leviticus 19 is important to us because of the prominence of its teaching in the New Testament.

The Necessity of Holiness
  1. The necessity of holiness is found in the first primary commandment: “You shall be holy, for I the LORD your God am holy” (Lev. 19:2). Note the following factors relative to this command.

    1. The necessity of holiness is seen by the fact that the entire nation of Israelite is commanded to be holy.

2. The command also provides a motivation for holiness.

3. There is also a provision for the holiness which God required of His people

4. God Himself provided the pattern for holiness

file:///C:/Users/Charles/Documents/Romans%2010%203%20Not%20seeing%20the%20Holiness%20of%20God%20%2009%2008.html

Why The Gentiles and not the Jews Romans 9 25-28

English Standard Version (ESV)
God’s Sovereign Choice Romans Chapter Nine

image.png
1 I am speaking the truth in Christ—I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit— 2 that I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers,[a] my kinsmen according to the flesh. 4 They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. 5 To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen.
6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, 7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” 8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. 9 For this is what the promise said: “About this time next year I will return, and Sarah shall have a son.” 10 And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls— 12 she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” 13 As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”
14 What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means! 15 For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” 16 So then it depends not on human will or exertion,[b] but on God, who has mercy. 17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” 18 So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.
19 You will say to me then, “Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?” 20 But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, “Why have you made me like this?” 21 Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use? 22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory— 24 even us whom he has called, not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles? 25 As indeed he says in Hosea,
“Those who were not my people I will call ‘my people,’    and her who was not beloved I will call ‘beloved.’”26 “And in the very place where it was said to them, ‘You are not my people,’    there they will be called ‘sons of the living God.’”
27 And Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: “Though the number of the sons of Israel[c] be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant of them will be saved, 28 for the Lord will carry out his sentence upon the earth fully and without delay.” 29 And as Isaiah predicted,
“If the Lord of hosts had not left us offspring,     we would have been like Sodom     and become like Gomorrah.” Israel’s Unbelief
30 What shall we say, then? That Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness have attained it, that is, a righteousness that is by faith; 31 but that Israel who pursued a law that would lead to righteousness[d] did not succeed in reaching that law. 32 Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as if it were based on works. They have stumbled over the stumbling stone, 33 as it is written,
“Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense;     and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.”
——–]

Bible and notes used in 1966
9:25-29 The rejecting of the Jews, and the taking in the Gentiles, were foretold in the Old Testament. It tends very much to the clearing of a truth, to observe how the Scripture is fulfilled in it. It is a wonder of Divine power and mercy that there are any saved: for even those left to be a seed, if God had dealt with them according to their sins, had perished with the rest. This great truth this Scripture teaches us. Even among the vast number of professing Christians it is to be feared that only a remnant will be saved. Matthew Henry  http://biblehub.com/romans/9-29.htm

 The situation in view here in these verses is Paul’s contemporary situation, and it is the same today. We saw it in verse 24: some Jews are being called to salvation and Gentiles too are now included in the salvation that was once promised to Israel. The main issue that Paul has been dealing with since verse 3 is that only some Jews are called. Many are accursed and cut off from Christ.

Why? Why are there so few Jews believing in Christ? His first answer in verses 6-29 is that God has chosen some in Israel to be saved, but not all. God is not obliged to save every Israelite: “It is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring” (v. 8). God does this, verse 11 says, “in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls.” So the freedom of God in election is Paul’s first answer to why only some Jews – and now also Gentiles (v. 24) – are being saved.

Barnes’ Notes on the Bible http://biblecommenter.com/romans/9-29.htm
And as Esaias (Isaiah) said before, Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha. 9 vs 29
And as Esaias said – Isaiah 1:9.

Before – The apostle had just cited one prediction from the tenth chapter of Isaiah. He now says that Isaiah had affirmed the same thing in a previous part of his prophecy.

Except the Lord of Sabaoth – In Isaiah, the Lord of Hosts. The word “Sabaoth” is the Hebrew word rendered “hosts” (armies). It properly denotes armies or military hosts organized for war. Hence, it denotes the “hosts of heaven,” and means:

Romans 9 Justif by faith in Christ
(1) “The angels” who are represented as marshalled or arranged into military orders; Ephesians 1:21; Ephesians 3:10; Ephesians 6:12; Colossians 1:16; Colossians 2:15; Jde 1:6; 1 Kings 22:19, “I saw the Lord sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him;” Psalm 103:21; Psalm 148:2.

(2) the stars; Jeremiah 33:22, “As the host of heaven cannot be numbered, etc.” Isaiah 40:26; Deuteronomy 4:19, etc. God is called the Lord of hosts, as being at the head of all these armies; their King and their Commander. It is a phrase properly expressive of his majesty and power, and is appropriately introduced here, as the “act of saving” “the seed” was a signal “act of power” in the midst of great surrounding wickedness.

Had left – Had preserved, or kept from destruction. Here their preservation is ascribed to God, and it is affirmed that if God had not interposed, “the whole nation” would have been cut off. This fully establishes the doctrine of the apostle, that God might cast off the Jews, and extend the blessings to the Gentiles.
A seed – The Hebrew in Isaiah means “one surviving or escaping,” corresponding with the word “remnant.” The word “seed” commonly means in the Scriptures “descendants, posterity.” In this place it means “a part, a small portion; a remnant,” like the small portion of the harvest which is reserved for sowing.

We had been as Sodoma – The nation was so wicked, that unless God had preserved a small number who were pious from the general corruption of the people, they would have been swept off by judgment, like Sodom and Gomorrah. We are told that ten righteous men would have saved Sodom; Genesis 18:32. Among the Israelites, in a time of great general depravity, a small number of holy men were found who preserved the nation. The design of the apostle here was the same as in the previous verses – to show that it was settled in the Jewish history that God might cast off the people, and reject them from enjoying the special privileges of his friends. It is true that in Isaiah he has reference to the temporal punishments of the Jews. But it settles “a great principle,” for which Paul was contending, that God might cast off the nation consistently with his promises and his plans. We may learn here,

(1) That the existence of religion among a people is owing to the love of God. “Except the Lord “had left us, etc.”
(2) it is owing to his mercy that “any men” are kept from sin, and any nation from destruction.
(3) we see the value of religion and of pious people in a nation. Ten such would have saved Sodom; and a few such saved Judea; compare Matthew 5:13-14.
(4) God has aright to withdraw his mercies from any other people, however exalted their privileges, and leave them to ruin; and we should not be high-minded, but fear; Rom, Matthew 10:20.

What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith. 9:30
But when we get to Romans 9:30 Paul gives another answer. It’s an old, familiar answer from Romans 1-8. Why are many Gentiles and only some Jews being saved, but Israel as a whole is not – for now? Answer: Gentiles are finding righteousness and Israel is not. Verses 30-31: “What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith [there’s the reason they are being included]; 31 but Israel, pursuing a law of righteousness, did not arrive at that law [there’s the reason they are not being included].”
What shall we say then? – What conclusion shall we draw from the previous train of remarks? To what results have we come by the passages adduced from the Old Testament? This question is asked preparatory to his summing up the argument; and he had so stated the argument that the conclusion which he was about to draw was inevitable.

The Gentiles – That many of the Gentiles; or that the way was open for them, and many of them “had actually” embraced the righteousness of faith. This Epistle was written as late as the year ad at that time multitudes of pagans had embraced the Christian religion. It is possible that the Gentiles may never have even heard that there is a law of Moses.

Which followed not after righteousness – The apostle does not mean that none of the pagans had any solicitude about right and wrong, or that there were no anxious inquiries among them; but he intends particularly to place them in contrast with the Jew. They had not made it their main object to justify themselves; they were not filled with prejudice and pride as the Jews were, who supposed that they had complied with the Law, and who felt no need of any other justification; they were sinners, and they felt it, and had no such mighty obstacle in a system of self-righteousness to overcome as the Jew had. Still it was true that they were excessively wicked, and that the prevailing characteristic among them was that they did not follow after righteousness; see Romans

1. The word “followed” here often denotes to pursue with intense energy, as a hunter pursues his game, or a man pursues a flying enemy. The Jews had sought righteousness in that way; the Gentiles had not. The word “righteousness” here means the same as justification. The Gentiles, which sought not justification, have obtained justification.
The other Sunday when Alan Harris was here and we had 33 guest. One of the guest said of Alan preaching,  “I like this preaching but its not for me”  Its not that he is a bad person but he has an no attitude toward God.

Have attained to righteousness – Have become justified. This was a matter of fact; and this was what the prophet had predicted. The apostle does not say that the sins of the Gentiles, or their indifference to the subject, was any reason why God justified them, or that people would be as safe in sin as in attempting to seek for salvation. He establishes the doctrine, indeed, that God is a sovereign; but still it is implied that the gospel did not have the special obstacle to contend with among the Gentiles that it had among the Jews. There was less pride, obstinacy, self-confidence; and people were more easily brought “to see” that they were sinners, and to feel their need of a Saviour. Though God dispenses his favors as a sovereign, and though all are opposed by nature to the gospel, yet it is always true that the gospel finds more obstacles among some people than among others. This was a most cutting and humbling doctrine to the pride of a Jew; and it is no wonder, therefore, that the apostle guarded it as he did.
Which is of faith – Justification by faith in Christ; see the note at Romans 1:17.

Two Non-Contradictory Reasons for Salvation (Piper)Piper 1
Now let’s pause right here and make sure that we see the massively obvious and important thing. There are at least two reasons anyone gets saved, and they are not contradictory. One reason is that God has chosen him unconditionally (Romans 9:11, 21-23) and called him effectually to himself (9:8, 24). God is the decisive actor in this matter of salvation. But there is another reason why a person gets saved: namely, that he “attains righteousness.” Verse 30: “Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith.” This is why they were saved. They attained righteousness.

So be sure that you keep these two things together: unconditional election, and the attaining of righteousness. When God chooses unconditionally an unworthy sinner like you or me to be his child and to be saved from wrath and given everlasting joy, he can’t just bring us into his fellowship without any righteousness. God is holy and perfect and just. He hates sin. His righteousness blazes against all God-belittling attitudes and actions. Imperfection of any kind cannot approach his blazing holiness without being punished. The only persons who stand before God without being destroyed are perfectly righteous persons.

The Way of Salvation According to the Law: here is a perfect explaination of the need of Christ for our salvation and why its not by our right living that gets us saved.
So there is none righteous, no not one – except Christ. The perfect Christ. The sinless Christ. And so Paul says, “The goal of the law is Christ for righteousness for everyone who believes.” What does the law teach as the way of salvation? Two things, in perfect harmony.

1. First, trust and obey God perfectly and you will be righteous and you will be saved. Accomplish a perfect obedience of faith and you will stand righteous before God. That’s the first message of the law. Nobody but Jesus, in all the world, has ever, or will ever, fulfill the law’s demand for perfect faith and the obedience flowing from it. God knew that when he wrote the law. That’s why, in his grace the law has another message in perfect harmony with the first.

2. The second message of the law is this: since you cannot fulfill the demand for a perfect obedience of faith, look (through blemish-free, sacrificed lambs) to the long-term goal and end of the law. That is, look to final, blemish-free Lamb of God offered in your place. Look to “Christ for righteousness.” Let your faith not merely be a trust in God to help you perform an imperfect righteousness (that will never suffice!), but let your faith also be a trust in God to provide the perfect righteousness that another has done for you – “Christ for righteousness for everyone who believes.” That’s the second message of the law concerning salvation.
But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness. 9:31

Romans 9 30 redemption

But Israel – The Jews. The apostle does not mean to affirm that none of the Jews had obtained mercy, but that “as a people,” or acting according to the prevalent principles of the nation to work out their own righteousness, they had not obtained it.

Which followed after the law of righteousness – The phrase, “the law of righteousness,” means the law of justice, or “the just law.” That Law demands perfect purity; and even its external observance demanded holiness. The Jews supposed that they rendered such obedience to that Law as to constitute “a meritorious” ground of justification. This they had “followed after,” that is, pursued zealously and unremittingly. The reason why they did not obtain justification in that way is fully stated in Romans 1-3 where it is shown that the Law demands perfect compliance with its precepts; and that Jews, as well as Gentiles, had altogether failed in rendering such compliance.

Hath not attained to the law of righteousness – They have not come to yield true obedience to the Law, even though imperfect; not such obedience as to give evidence that they have been justified. We may remark here,
1) That no conclusion could have been more humbling to a Jew than this. It constituted the whole of the prevalent religion, and was the object of their incessant toils.
(2) as they made the experiment fully, and failed: as they had the best advantages for it, and did not succeed, but reared only a miserable and delusive system of self-righteousness Philippians 3:4-9; it follows, that all similar experiments must fail, and that none now can be justified by the Law.
(3) thousands fail in the same attempt.

Romans 9 30 Lord of host cloud

They seek to justify themselves before God. They attempt to weave a righteousness of their own. The moral man does this. The immoral man attempts it as much as the moral man, and is as confident in his own righteousness. The troubled sinner does this; and this it is which keeps him so long from the cross of Christ. All this must be renounced; and man must come as a poor, lost, ruined sinner, and throw himself upon the mere mercy of God in Christ for justification and life.

Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone; 9:32

Wherefore? – Why? The apostle proceeds to state the reason why so uniform and remarkable a result happened. “They sought it not by faith, etc.” They depended on their own righteousness, and not on the mercy of God to be obtained by faith.

By the works of the law – By complying with all the demands of the Law so that they might merit salvation. Their attempted obedience included their prayers, fastings, sacrifices, etc., as well as compliance with the demands of the moral law. It may be asked here, perhaps, how the Jews could know any better than this? how should they know anything about justification by faith? To this I:answer:
(1) That the doctrine was stated in the Old Testament;

Romans 9:9-13 Bound By The Lord’s Purpose

BOUND BY THE LORD’S PURPOSE: UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION AND THE INVINCIBLE PURPOSE OF GOD

ROMANS 9:6-13

Pastor/Teacher Charles e Whisnant April 28 2013

Romans 9:9 For this is the word of promise: “AT THIS TIME I WILL COME, AND SARAH SHALL HAVE A SON.”

  • Genesis 17:21; 18:10, 14; Hebrews 11:11; 12:17

PROMISE (1860) to tell, declare) originally referred to an announcement or declaration (especially of a favorable message). Mention 53 times in the KJV

  • Paul is reminding his readers that God’s choice is not based on natural descent. Isaac’s  birth is supernatural and represents God’s sovereign choice.

TIME (2540) (kairos means a point of time or period of time, time, period, frequently with the implication of being especially fit for something and without emphasis on precise chronology. It means a moment or period as especially appropriate the right, proper, favorable time (at the right time). Refers to a specific and often predetermined period or moment of time and so views in terms of events.

Romans 9:10 And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived * twins by one man, our father Isaac

  • Romans 5:3,11; Genesis 25:21-23

AND NOT ONLY THIS: – The connective “and” indicates Paul is giving another example to illustrate his point.

BY ONE MAN OUR FATHER ISAAC: – Rebekah’s children had one and the same father.

  • Paul’s point is that unlike Ishmael and Isaac who were of a single father, but two mothers, Esau and Jacob had one mother and one father and that furthermore, they were twins conceived in the same act of union .

Romans 9:11 for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose (according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls, (kjv: election rather than choice. )

  • Romans 4:17; Psalms 51:5, Ephesians 2:3
  • GOOD:(18) (agathos) means profitable, benefiting others, whereas the related word kalos means constitutionally good, but not necessarily benefiting others.
  • BAD OR EVIL (5337) (phaulos) [ worthless, bad or of no account. It describes the impossibility of any true gain ever coming forth. The notion of worthlessness is central to the meaning. Note the KJV (Textus Receptus) translates a different Greek word (kakos) which denotes a lack of something and thus that which is bad or not as it ought to be.

John 3:20;5:29; 2 Corinthians 5:10; Titus 2:8; James 3:16.

IN ORDER THAT GOD’S PURPOSE ACCORDING TO HIS CHOICE MIGHT STAND (remain continually):

Romans 8:28-30; Isaiah 14:24-27; 23:9; 46:10-11; Jeremiah 51:29; Ephesians 1:9-11; 3:11; 2 Timothy 1:9; Ephesians 1:4-5; I Thessalonians 1:4; 2 Peter 1:10; Ephesians 2:9; Titus 3:5;

PURPOSE (4286)  (prothesis) from protíthemi = set before oneself and so to purpose or plan) means to plan in advance. It describes that which is planned or purposed in advance. Here it describes God’s intention beforehand. Matthew 14:4; Mark 2:26; Luke 6:4; Acts 11:23; 27:13; Ephesians 1:11.

  • speaks of the action of an individual setting before himself a proposed action. Thus, it presupposes deliberation upon a course of conduct, and then the determination to carry it through.

CHOICE Election (1589) (ekloge from eklegomai ) in turn from ek = out + lego = select, choose, eklegomai meaning to choose or select for oneself, but not necessarily implying rejection of what is not chosen.

  • Means literally a choosing out, a picking out, a selection or an election (2 Peter 1:10; I Thessalonians 1:4- referring to God’s selection of believers).
  • In the passive sense refers to God’s selection for a purpose or task. In other words it represents a special choice as when God referred to Paul as “my chosen instrument” (Acts 9:15). In Romans 11:28 choice speaks of God’s choice of Israel, who were selected by Him to carry out His specific plan of redemption for mankind.
  • In the context of Scripture ekloge speaks of election, the benevolent purpose of God by which any are chosen unto salvation so that they are led to embrace and persevere in Christ’s bestowed grace and the enjoyment of its privileges and blessings here and hereafter. Although not used in this way in the present context, ekloge, can describe election which is vocational. The Lord called out the tribe of Levi to be His priests, but Levites were not thereby guaranteed salvation. Jesus called twelve men to be apostles but only eleven of them to salvation. After Paul came to Christ because of God’s election to salvation, God then chose him in another way to be His special apostle to the Gentiles (Acts 9:15; Romans 1:5).

NOT BECAUSE OF WORKS BUT BECAUSE OF HIM WHO CALLS:

  • Ephesians 2:9; Titus 3:9, Calling: Romans 8:218; 1 Thessalonians 2:12, 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14; 1 Peter 5:10 and Revelation 17:14

NOT BECAUSE OF WORKS, BUT. – Literally the Greek reads “not out of works but out of the calling

  • In other words, it is not because of anything that man does within himself. In the current verse Esau and Jacob were not born so they could not have done anything yet. Man does not obtain salvation by his works. He cannot manipulate God by His works. God is sovereign in election and in salvation.
  • CALLS: in this content means “calls to salvation” . God’s call to salvation in the epistles of Paul and Peter is an “effectual” call so that in essence those who are called equates with those who are chosen (the elect).

Romans 9:12 IT WAS SAID TO HER THE OLDER (Esau) WILL SERVE THE YOUNGER (Jacob):

  • (Genesis 25:22-23, 2 Samuel 8:14; 1 Kings 22:47)
  • SERVE:(1398) (douleuo from doulos = slave or one who is in bondage or bound to another, in the state of being completely controlled by someone or something) means to be in bondage or in the position of a servant and to act accordingly, dutifully obeying the master’s commands.

Romans 9:13 JUST AS IT IS WRITTEN:

  • WRITTEN (1125) (grapho) is in the  perfect tense) which emphasizes the lasting and binding authority of that which was written. It has been written at some point in time in the past and it “stands” written.
  • God’s election is…Not based on natural descent Not based on works (good or bad) But According to His purpose

JACOB I LOVED BUT ESAU I HATED:

  • Malachi 1:2-3
  • LOVED: (verb) (25) (agapao) means to love unconditionally and sacrificially as God Himself loves sinful men (John 3:16), the way He loves the Son (John 3:35; 15:9;17:23-24). Also is a verb and by its verbal nature calls for action. This quality of love is not an emotion but is an action initiated by a volitional choice. And MacArhtur says: expresses the purest, noblest form of love, which is volitionally driven, not motivated by superficial appearance, emotional attraction, or sentimental relationship
  • JACOB I LOVED: – The Hebrew idiomatic phrase (according to Rienecker) can mean “I prefer Jacob to Esau”. In other words in context God choose Jacob even though Esau was the firstborn. Don’t forget though that Esau sold his birthright for a mess of porridge — he despised his birthright (Genesis 25:34)
  • HATE (3404) (miseo from misos = hatred) means to dislike strongly or to love less. However, God’s favor and blessing upon Jacob was so extensive that by comparison Esau would appear to be hated. The verse could be understood to mean that God has chosen Jacob to fulfill His elective purpose, but He has passed over Esau. Keep in mind that Esau rejected God. The divine rationale for this action is simply the elective purpose of God in Israel

Comment:  Let me say I do a lot of research for the lessons I must say I am not original very much. I gleam from Martyn Lloyd-Jones and John MacArthur, and have over the last 40 years.  My notes reflect my study from a number of resources.  But I would say as I view them when I am teaching,  I am original in how I will say what I am going to say, if that makes sense.  My notes could take 10 minutes to read and I will teach 40 minutes, thus much of what I say are not in my notes.  But what I do say, I have more than likely hear or read.

  • .

http://bibleencyclopedia.com/slides/romans/9-9.htm

Is JUDAISM the Religion of Moses?

Is JUDAISM the Religion of Moses? Part One

O.T. Book man

So much of what we know is really not the whole truth but only what we have been taught. Charles e Whisnant

I am studying Romans 9-11 in our series

http://hope-of-israel.org/judaism.htm

How much do you know about the Jewish sects mentioned in your New Testament — the Pharisees, Sadducees, Scribes, and the Herodians and Zealots? Were they all really YEHOVAH God’s Old Testament Church?

by E. Martin

People assume that Judaism is the religion of Moses — that Yeshua brought a message opposed to the Old Testament — that he came to nullify the teaching of Moses. It is taken for granted that the New Testament presents a Gentile religion and that the Old Testament teaches Judaism!

Yet all these assumptions ARE ABSOLUTELY FALSE! Shocking though it may seem, history proves that Judaism is NOT the religion of the Old Testament Scriptures. Judaism is plainly and simply the religion of the Jews — a religion manufactured by their own ingenuity. The Jews of Roman times had appropriated the name of Moses as the author of their religion — but in actuality, they had rejected Moses. Yeshua said: “Had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me … but ye believe not his writings” (John 5:46, 47). The Jews used the name of Moses, but they didn’t practice what he commanded.

Just as today, there are hundreds of denominations and sects in what is commonly called Christianity, all appropriating the name of the Messiah — saying they are Christian — but contradicting each other and failing to practice what he taught! And history proves that the Jews had misappropriated the name of Moses.

In effect, Judaism was a man-made religion! Yeshua said that they were “teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Mark 7:7).

It is time we looked into the records of history. It is time we learned how the Jews departed from the religion of Moses. We will be dumbfounded to discover that Yeshua, in reality, re-emphasized the message that Moses brought — in its true spiritual INTENTION. And, instead of nullifying Moses’ teaching, he magnified it, having in view the true spiritual purpose originally intended.

The time has come to get our eyes open to the facts! Judaism was not, and is not, the religion of Moses!

IT IS obvious to the most superficial reader of the New Testament that a fundamental difference existed between the teaching of Yeshua and the Judaism of his day.

Why?

The answer is surprising!

History shows — and the Jews themselves admit — that their religion had drifted far away from the simple doctrines of Scripture — commonly called the “Old Testament.” The Jews had modified YEHOVAH God’s law and even instituted laws and commandments of their own which were, in many instances, diametrically opposite to the precepts of Moses.

It is time we realize that the Messiah came to a people who had, through their human laws and traditions, rejected the religion of the Old Testament which YEHOVAH God had given to their forefathers.

These are the plain facts of history. It is important that we understand this if we are to comprehend the significance of events in the New Testament period. The Messiah, in effect, came to retrieve the Jews from their apostasy — from their rejection of the laws of YEHOVAH God. And, he came to reveal to them the Gospel — the New Testament revelation — to COMPLETE the promises that YEHOVAH gave to Moses, not to do away with them!

 

The Divisions of Judaism

Many people have erroneously assumed that the Judaism in the time of the Messiah was a religion united in a common bond — every Jew believing about the same thing — all united into one major Jewish denomination.

This is the first illusion that history reveals.

Judaism was divided into MANY SECTS in Yeshua’s day. Each had its peculiar beliefs. One of the most authoritative Jewish writers on Judaism, Dr. Herford, tells us: “If it were possible to analyze the Judaism of the New Testament period into all its component elements, the results of the process would be to show HOW COMPLEX A VARIETY is summed up under that name, and HOW FAR FROM THE TRUTH it is to speak of the Jews collectively as if they were all alike, in respect to their Judaism” (Judaism in the New Testament Period, pp. 41, 42).

Judaism was not one unified organization. Actually, there were many religious sects comprising it. And, even within some of these major sects there were many “splinter” groups which had their own ideas and beliefs. In many respects, the Judaism of the Messiah’s time was not unlike our own world. We have many competitive sects representing “Christianity.” So likewise, the Jews had their divisions, differing sects representing “Judaism.”

Some of these sects will be familiar to readers of the New Testament. There were the Pharisees, Scribes, Sadducees, Zealots and Herodians. However, there were many more divisions of which we have a good deal of history. Some of these were the Essenes, the Qumran sects (who wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls of which so much has been written lately), and others who are called, by contemporary religious historians, Apocalyptics.

There were other divisions among the Jews who lived in the surrounding areas, such as Egypt, Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, Greece, etc. There certainly was not just one single Jewish sect — Judaism was split into many fragments.

But history reveals another shocking and little-understood fact. It will eradicate the fiction from many people’s minds that the Jews, as a whole, were deeply interested in religion at this time in history.